|
|
BEST PRACTICES:
Community gene banking and on-farm conservation in
India
Conservation efforts in relation to plant genetic
resources are usually divided into two categories, in situ conservation
and ex situ conservation. In this example of benefit sharing from India,
in situ, or on-farm, conservation is used as a means to revive old
varieties and increase seed diversity, thus rewarding and supporting farmers'
contributions.
Traditional agriculture in India is one of the oldest
and most advanced forms of food production. It has proved to be inherently
sustainable over centuries and rates high in terms of total productivity,
self-reliance, diversity and the depth of its indigenous knowledge. With the
advent of the green revolution however, this changed. Together with the
modernization of agriculture, changes in agricultural practices and cropping
patterns, the green revolution led to the erosion of genetic diversity. It was
in this context that the Genetic Resource Ecology Energy Nutrition Foundation
(GREEN) initiated a people's movement for in situ conservation aimed at
moving beyond the limited scope of gene banks.
Working in the dry land regions of southern India, the GREEN
Foundation took the initiative to involve farmers in on-farm conservation of
the subsistence crops of the area. Building farmer-based community seed-supply
systems and campaigning for Farmers' Rights to biodiversity have been the main
focus of this work, where a basic idea has been that on-farm conservation and
sustainable agriculture could benefit from a partnership involving farmers,
scientists and consumers.
The on-farm conservation efforts consist of
interaction with individual farmers and community farms; focus on community
seed supply, training of farmers as key seed keepers and the forming of an
association of farmers to take the movement forward. Sustainable agricultural
practices form a major component of the training. Since women play a major role
in the conservation of diversity at the farm level, the project took this into
account when designing its strategy. It is women who decide on the amount of
seed and selections of varieties to be stored and the various ways of storing
them, and a gender-sensitive approach was therefore recognized as
necessary.
One of the means employed by the GREEN Foundation to conserve
and revive old varieties, has been community seed banks. These community seed
banks are low-cost, low-technology systems owned and managed by the local
communities. The concept involves two major components: a seed store and
germplasm repository for local crop improvement, and a field gene bank.
Consisting of land-race material grown locally, the seed store becomes a backup
to the local market networks where farmers normally exchange seeds and
information. These can be crucial in ensuring a sustained supply of locally
adapted seeds, thereby averting the potential loss of genetic diversity. Not
only do the seed banks serve as repositories for seed, but they also function
as places where the community can interact, exchange seeds and share
information. As of 2008 there are 25 GREEN-initiated community seed banks; on
average they have 15 to 20 members, most of whom are women. Together these
banks conserve some 43 varieties of finger millet, 84 varieties of paddy, 24
sorghum varieties, 44 minor millets, 53 pulses, 14 oilseeds, 4 wheat varieties
and 116 vegetable seeds.
From the
beginning it has been important to the GREEN Foundation to ensure through
capacity-building that the farmers are able to carry the work forward
themselves. As an important step towards seed conservation and the creation of
a stable seed system, a participatory breeding programme was initiated to
involve farmers in the variety-selection process. Farmers determined their
selection criteria, for example the level of resistance to pests and diseases,
drought tolerance or other plant characteristics, and then on-farm trials were
performed before wider dissemination. Through these experiments, the farmers
have witnessed the benefits of using traditional seeds and become motivated to
carry on the conservation and maintenance of traditional varieties. In addition
to the farmers who have participated directly in the on-farm conservation
activities of the GREEN Foundation project, there are also many who have
acquired seeds informally.
An external evaluation conducted in April
2000 concluded that, due to the efforts of the GREEN Foundation, there has been
an appreciable increase in seed diversity in the project region. More recently,
GREEN findings indicate that there is now greater awareness of the value of
using and conserving traditional varieties. In the combination of efforts that
constitute a successful on-farm conservation network, the community seed banks
occupy an important place. The aim of the GREEN Foundation has been to increase
diversity both in terms of species and varieties, and these efforts have proven
successful in reviving the genetic resources so basic to the survival of
small-scale farmers. In the course of the past decade, several indigenous
varieties have once again found their way into the fields of farmers. This
success can be seen as a way of achieving benefit sharing through the creation
of a small-scale reward and support system. Farmers are encouraged and
supported in their efforts to revive, maintain and develop plant genetic
diversity. As a result of the increased diversity, their food security is
improved.
Again the collaboration between farmers, scientists and an NGO
has proven valuable. Indeed, this is probably the most important lesson to be
learned from this project, in addition to the fact that various measures
employed together have strengthened in situ conservation in the
region.
(The information in this text is largely derived from an
article
written by Vanaja Ramprasad for the Growing Diversity Project, completed
2002)
Pages in this
sub-section:
SUCCESS STORIES ON BENEFIT-SHARING
MEASURES
Creating incentive structures from the
ground in the Philippines
Community seed fairs in
Zimbabwe
Community gene banking and on-farm
conservation in India
Dynamic Conservation and Participatory
Plant Breeding in France
Participatory plant breeding adding
value in Nepal
Capacity-building for seed potato
selection in Kenya
The Peruvian Potato Park
Rewarding best
practices in Norway |
Top
 |
|
|
In this
section:
|

  |
|